compound 38 is not an OGG1 inhibitor. It is a newer OGG1 activator, specifically a serotonin-derived ORCA that accele
rates the AP-lyase step of OGG1-mediated repair. In the 2025 paper, it was optimized to very high potency (AC50 0.040
μM) and the authors explicitly say it “accelerated the AP-lyase activity of the disease-associated mutant Ser326Cys.”
They also model it in the DNA-bound context, which matches the way you asked to run Boltz. Sources: J Med Chem 2025 /
PMC12621200 (Giving an Enzyme Scissors: Serotonin Derivatives as Potent Organocatalytic Switches for DNA Repair Enzyme OGG1 - PMC) and the older OGG1 activator review summary RSC Med
Chem 2024 / PMC11487406 (Therapeutic upregulation of DNA repair pathways: strategies and small molecule activators - PMC).What that means for your result:
- Our Boltz panel puts compound 38 first in the S326C + 8-oxoG:C context: C:/Users/User.codex/
alex_chen_nucleus_dna_download_vcf_NU-PGIK-3398%20(1).vcf/gene_sequences/boltz2_ogg1/results/
boltz2_ogg1_dna_panel_metrics.tsv- But Boltz does not prove “restores mutant to WT.”
- The literature-backed claim for compound 38 is narrower: it improves Ser326Cys AP-lyase activity.
- If you want the stronger “back toward WT” precedent, that is actually compound F: in the 2018 Ser326Cys study, the
authors say compound F restored variant 8-oxodG incision activity to wild-type extract levels in their mitochondrial
system. Source: Free Radic Biol Med 2018 / PMC6098717 (Enhanced Mitochondrial DNA Repair of the Common Disease- Associated Variant, Ser326Cys, of hOGG1 through Small Molecule Intervention - PMC).So the honest ranking is:
- compound 38: best current first-pass candidate from your Boltz run, and real literature support for Ser326Cys
activation- compound F: older scaffold, but the cleanest published “restored to WT-like activity” evidence in a Ser326Cys model
- TH10785: strong activator scaffold overall, but more “gain a new function” than “specifically rescue Ser326Cys to
WT”On upregulating OGG1: yes, in principle that could partly compensate, but not in a simple linear way.
- Reviews explicitly say upregulating OGG1 may enhance BER because OGG1 is the first, rate-limiting step for oxidized-
base BER: PMC11487406 (Therapeutic upregulation of DNA repair pathways: strategies and small molecule activators - PMC)- There are examples of raising OGG1 activity or abundance through compound F, CoQ10/ubiquinol, and upstream axes like
SIRT3, AMPK, and HDAC1: PMC11487406 (Therapeutic upregulation of DNA repair pathways: strategies and small molecule activators - PMC), PMC7235043
(HDAC1 modulates OGG1-initiated oxidative DNA damage repair in the aging brain and Alzheimer’s disease - PMC)- But “more OGG1” does not automatically mean “normal repair,” because BER is a pathway, not one enzyme, and OGG1 also
has context-dependent inflammatory/transcriptional roles: PubMed 39119702
(OGG1: An emerging multifunctional therapeutic target for the treatment of diseases caused by oxidative DNA damage - PubMed)So my blunt take:
- compound 38 looks like a plausible rescue-style activator.
- No, we cannot say from Boltz that it restores your mutant to true WT function.
- Yes, boosting OGG1 activity/expression is a plausible compensation strategy, but it should be treated as partial
rescue, not a full correction.If you want, I can do the next two useful steps:
- run matched WT + 8-oxoG:C + compound 38 / compound F controls so we can compare mutant vs WT directly;
- build a short ranked “OGG1 compensation” note covering compound 38, compound F, TH10785, CoQ10/ubiquinol, and
SIRT3/AMPK/HDAC1 routes.
• Yes, but mostly as an indirect support strategy, not a clean substitute for compound 38.
My read is:
- Resveratrol is the best phytochemical lead for an OGG1-support idea.
- A 2024 review says resveratrol increased OGG1 activity and expression and reduced 8-oxoG/γH2AX in human cells.
That is supportive, but not Ser326Cys-specific proof. Source: PMC11487406
(Therapeutic upregulation of DNA repair pathways: strategies and small molecule activators - PMC)
- A 2024 review says resveratrol increased OGG1 activity and expression and reduced 8-oxoG/γH2AX in human cells.
- Sulforaphane is a plausible second choice, but this is more inference than direct OGG1 evidence.
- We have direct evidence that NRF2 induction can upregulate OGG1: PMC3665669
(Antioxidant-mediated up-regulation of OGG1 via NRF2 induction is associated with inhibition of oxidative DNA damage in estrogen-induced breast cancer - PMC) - We also have strong evidence that sulforaphane is an NRF2 inducer: PMC6854598
(Gene targets of sulforaphane in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma - PMC) - So sulforaphane is a reasonable mechanistic candidate, but I am explicitly inferring the OGG1 part.
- We have direct evidence that NRF2 induction can upregulate OGG1: PMC3665669
- Curcumin, EGCG, and quercetin are much weaker for this exact target.
- They have broad antioxidant / DNA-protective literature, but I did not find comparably strong direct OGG1 rescue
evidence for your use case.
- They have broad antioxidant / DNA-protective literature, but I did not find comparably strong direct OGG1 rescue
The upstream biology that matters most is:
- SIRT3 stabilizes and deacetylates OGG1, preserving its incision activity under oxidative stress: PMC3730425
(Interaction of Sirt3 with OGG1 contributes to repair of mitochondrial DNA and protects from apoptotic cell death under oxidative stress - PMC) - AMPK can raise SIRT3 and OGG1: PMC6202232 (Activation of AMPK-SIRT3 Signaling is Chondroprotective by Preserving Mitochondrial DNA Integrity and Function - PMC)
So the practical phytochemical hierarchy is:
- Resveratrol
- Sulforaphane
- maybe Curcumin as a low-confidence general oxidative-stress support compound, not an OGG1-specific tool
Important caveat:
- More OGG1 is not automatically “better” in every tissue state. Recent reviews emphasize OGG1 has repair roles but a
lso redox/transcriptional roles, so indiscriminate upregulation is not a pure win everywhere: Clinical Epigenetics
2025 (https://clinicalepigeneticsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13148-025-01978-x), Antioxidants 2025
(https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3921/14/8/980)
For your Ser326Cys context, the cleanest summary is:
- phytochemicals can plausibly support the axis
- they are much more likely to be partial compensation than true normalization to wild type
- resveratrol and sulforaphane are the two I would take most seriously
If you want, I can do a Boltz follow-up next with a small exploratory panel:
- OGG1 S326C + 8-oxoG:C + resveratrol
- OGG1 S326C + 8-oxoG:C + sulforaphane
- OGG1 S326C + 8-oxoG:C + curcumin
- plus WT controls for the top 1-2 so we can compare directionally.
If you exclude resveratrol, the best remaining options are not equally good.
My ranking for your OGG1 Ser326Cys context is:
- Sulforaphane: best plant-derived candidate, but the case is indirect.
- Strong evidence it activates NRF2: PMID 21793854 (Regulation of the Keap1/Nrf2 system by chemopreventive sulforaphane: implications of posttranslational modifications - PubMed)
- NRF2 can drive OGG1 expression: PMID 36528059 (Nuclear factor Nrf2 promotes glycosidase OGG1 expression by activating the AKT pathway to enhance leukemia cell resistance to cytarabine - PubMed)
- So sulforaphane → NRF2 → more OGG1 support is a reasonable inference.
- What I do not have is a clean primary paper showing sulforaphane directly rescues Ser326Cys OGG1.
- Ubiquinol / CoQ10: stronger direct OGG1 evidence than most phytochemicals, but it is not really a plant
phytochemical.- Direct study: ubiquinol increased hOGG1 activity and favored glycosylase function in human fibroblast systems:
DNA Repair 2020 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1568786419302897) - This is one of the more defensible non-prescription OGG1-support ideas.
- Direct study: ubiquinol increased hOGG1 activity and favored glycosylase function in human fibroblast systems:
- Curcumin: weak for this exact target.
- I found review-level support that phytochemicals like curcumin may induce OGG1 through NRF2 in some oxidative/g
enotoxic contexts: PMC6607693 (Dissecting the prevention of estrogen-dependent breast carcinogenesis through Nrf2-dependent and independent mechanisms - PMC) - I did not find a strong direct OGG1 rescue paper comparable to compound F, TH10785, or ubiquinol.
- I found review-level support that phytochemicals like curcumin may induce OGG1 through NRF2 in some oxidative/g
- EGCG: also weak for this exact target.
- Same general NRF2-style review logic exists: PMC6607693 (Dissecting the prevention of estrogen-dependent breast carcinogenesis through Nrf2-dependent and independent mechanisms - PMC)
- But the clearest primary hit I found was not true activation; in an arsenic kidney-cell model EGCG largely norm
alized stress-altered OGG1 expression rather than cleanly upregulating it as an OGG1 therapy: PMC11178478
(Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) attenuates arsenic-induced fibrogenic changes in human kidney epithelial cells through reversal of epigenetic aberrations and antioxidant activities - PMC)
So the practical takeaway is:
- best plant-derived OGG1 support candidate: sulforaphane
- best accessible non-prescription OGG1-support candidate overall: ubiquinol
- curcumin and EGCG are much weaker, more generic antioxidant plays
One caution that matters: more OGG1 is not automatically a pure win. Recent reviews emphasize that OGG1 has both repa
ir and signaling/inflammatory roles, so indiscriminate upregulation is not universally beneficial: PMID 39119702
(OGG1: An emerging multifunctional therapeutic target for the treatment of diseases caused by oxidative DNA damage - PubMed), PMC11487406 (Therapeutic upregulation of DNA repair pathways: strategies and small molecule activators - PMC)
If you want, I can do one focused next pass on:
- sulforaphane
- ubiquinol
- NRF2
- SIRT3
- AMPK